PDSL Review Protocol (Public)

Review Goal

This review evaluates whether the public documentation for PDSL is coherent, transparent, ethically bounded, and interpretable—without requiring access to the private engine.

Reviewer Checklist (Conceptual)

1. Scope clarity: Is PDSL’s intended use stated without overclaiming?
2. Non-claims: Are causal/predictive claims explicitly excluded?
3. Interpretability: Is it clear that outputs require regime-based interpretation?
4. Disclosure boundary: Is sensitive implementation detail intentionally excluded?
5. Governance discipline: Are versioning and citation expectations explicit?
6. Ethics: Are misuse risks acknowledged and mitigations stated?

Review Outputs

Reviewers may provide: - suggested clarifications in language or structure - requests for additional conceptual transparency - concerns about misuse potential or disclosure boundaries

What Reviewers Should Not Expect Here

• engine source code
• equations or parameter thresholds
• operational testing endpoints
• deployment instructions

This is a documentation review release.